The initial response to reading “White Man’s Burden” is to cry out how the poet must be using irony and sarcasm as he scorns colonial habits. While it may seem that Kipling is mocking the horrors of imperialism, one must first understand the context in which this poem was written. “White Man’s Burden” was published in McClure’s Magazine (a pro-imperialist publication), and served as Kipling’s guide of how to be an Empire. Through the end of the 19th century, the British Empire stood alone as the greatest imperial power in the world. As Kipling writes to the United States, “Comes now, to search your manhood…the judgment of your peers” Kipling is implying that America will now be judged as an adult Empire as they “Have done away with childish days” and now must handle themselves the way a powerful Empire should. Those who disagree with the notion that Kipling is an avowed imperialist often point to the language he uses to describe imperialism and how it is quite unpleasant. What these critics fail to realize is that one can realize the brutality and violence that comes with imperialism, and accept it at the same time. Kipling believes that it is virtuous for the white man to put on the “heavy harness” that is imperialism.
In our society today, those who are wealthy frequently practice philanthropy as they feel it is their burden to use their wealth to help those less fortunate. Just as the modern wealthy use their money to lift up the world’s poor, so too did Kipling feel it was the need for the British, and then the American’s to use their power as an Empire to help those, like the American’s did in the Philippines, although it may bring “thankless years”.
Tuesday, February 24
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
...wrong.
ReplyDeleteI think you brought up a great point in your response paper: the fact that Kipling, and any other pro-imperialist for that mattter, can realize the cruel and immoral nature of imperialism, yet still believe that it can result in a positive outcome for both parties involved. It doesn't seem out of character for powerful empires to truthfully believe that they were superior to other countries in that time period, and furthermore that this gave them an inherent right to intrude. In fact, looking back on United States history we followed a similar pattern with the idea of Manifest Destiny...
ReplyDeletei enjoyed your response paper and more specifically the point on the wealthy helping out the poor, however i think you should have addressed the point of the wealthy (European powers) becoming even more wealthy while helping out the poor (underdeveloped countries)
ReplyDeleteTrevor, your point is well made but unfortunately not correct. Kipling is being sarcastic. (I know Tim James burned the idea of Kipling as an Imperialist into your mind, but if you look at it from fresh eyes it is completely ridiculous to think he could be serious) Sorry bud
ReplyDelete