Imperialism Response Paper

Imperialism is defined as “a policy of extending your rule over foreign countries”. This is a common idea among influential countries in order to expand their borders. Although this may seem like a successful strategy to gain more power, it is not moral because it ruins the less powerful countries traditions, freedom, and way of living. Kipling’s, “White Man’s Burden” favors imperialism and discusses the idea that it is the Europeans (White man’s) duty to “civilize” the “savages” of the world and take over less powerful countries. Kipling makes it seem like imperialism is the only way for smaller countries to thrive, but he fails to recognize all the negative aspects of taking over a country. It is unethical to invade a small country and alter its economy, political structure, and society. Some may believe that the third world countries, in order to be somewhat successful, need to follow in Europe’s footsteps, but at the same time, when a powerful nation occupies a smaller country they tend to destroy their traditions, force religion upon them, and create enemies. The selfish behavior of imperialistic rulers causes a nation to become less united. When a country is constantly extending their borders and oppressing smaller countries, it can have an effect on the nationalistic nature of their citizens. Throughout our studies, we have learned that nations strive and prosper due to all citizens being united under one common goal. When goals and traditions are split and mixed, it is difficult for a country to be cohesive and powerful. Yes, Europe was very successful and progressed at a faster rate then most countries, but that doesn’t mean that powerful countries like Europe should have the right to ruin traditions and force rules upon other countries.